Saturday, January 28, 2012

For Geeti, Zainab, Sahar and Rona



   Multiculturalism here means          
              that
                if
            I stood
               rapt
           by the eyes
                or
           flaming kameez
                 or
              smile
                 or
           raven hair-

                 and
           if in growing love
                dared
                  kiss
           an umber neck
                   or
                smooth
           a downy arm
                   or
               give her
                  her
                  first
                   red
                   red
                  rose-

                    it
                 means
                   she'd
                     be
              ceremoniously
                   cold
                     at
                   dawn
______________________________

On Sunday 29 January, 2012 Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21 were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder. The judge condemned them for killing family members Geeti, Zainab, Sahar and Rona out of a "twisted concept of honour."

Friday, January 27, 2012

"In memoriam"



If I had more time with the Sun, and a warm
  cocktail d'hydratation ha! to try
     just once,

--and downward to the belly who'd not want
    to squirm, as needful as she?--

if only

    My view is of white leaf and of a lake
        shaley as eyes that cry,
      
her hands an inch thick now, and holding
    beads 'stead of me

Monday, January 23, 2012

A reading of Frank Davey's "When TISH Happens"



To begin with, I'd like to attribute the diurnal format of a book When TISH Happens (ECW Press, 2011) purporting to be about Canada's "most influential literary magazine" to the usual incongruity between design and intention (thematics and poetics, to put it in old school Jakobsonian terms). Here's the comical inappropriateness of poetry's star-making potential in Canada told in narrative (at least if you consider the literary success of most of the characters in Frank Davey's book as a type of stardom). To make an historical event too easily readable won't, not in Canada anyways, give the heady 60s TISH days at UBC more glam than it deserves nor burn the names Davey, Wah and Marlatt any more indelibly into the national psyche. It's just not something literary movements in my country tend to do. So Davey's flat line style, interspersed with the usual American influences and skinny-chested daring, the soupy anecdotals about dad & camping trips and campus flings with Daphne, are all the usual suspects in a dull literary autobiography. Not even Davey's own purported Metis background works for him either.

And then, of course, there's content never relieved by consistently clear development of TISH poetics, which would certainly have served as some compensation ( we'd best go to Robin Blaser's The Fire: Collected Essays of Robin Blaser for that). Yet TISH is a topic of perennial interest, whether as the usual fawning over big Olson-style manifestos (and everything about America came super- sized to these impressionable working-class kids) or some pretty ingenious adaptiveness to growing trends. If the grounds were ripe for Olson and Duncan in the 60s, Objectivist credos and parties at Warren Tallman's "Tish salon" it was because of the essentially full-credit Writers Workshop ethos (a minor version of the American MLA ideal also brought to Canadian campuses) that had already existed there and, quite frankly, enabled it. It was here the notion took root, perhaps for the first time and contrary to traditionalist spirit of A.J.M. Smith, Dorothy Livesay, that universities could be places not just for learning but teaching writing. There was a beginning of sorts here.

So there's the lack of a clearly developed TISH theory, not so much as once formulated as a keystone for discussion, always skirted, intermixed with anecdote and cars and parties, lost in the "small-time boy" leaving home for school narrative. What exactly were the origins of TISH then? Duncan's monotonous lectures on the transition from "path" to "field poems",  the interminableTallman home parties, or perhaps just the very idea for a magazine somebody--probably Tallman--had proposed quite spontaneously in the Summer of '61? Creeley had once read in the mathematics department and had been hired to teach at UBC shortly after: perhaps that had done the trick. The early squabbles about the real Tish 1-19 (Tish is here a variant on TISH meant to distinguish the magazine from its ghostly origins) once Wah, Bowering, Davey, Marlatt had formed its first editorial board did represent some interesting action on the ground, at last. Pauline Butling with her later "gender and age relationships" criticisms got my attention but apparently not Davey's.  But the only interesting part was too short-lived. And besides it did beg the question.

With editorials, student essays, and a provocative title rearranged every which way for maximum shock (perhaps Canada's first real "concrete" poem) the magazine appears, and even the promise of a Tishbook to be produced by quality offset press. But TISH? More Americans, Levertov, Ginsberg, Whalen and Coolidge and Tish spin-offs like Dudek's Delta; preparations for an oral defence; Birney's dispraises of TISH writers and writings in general, and the peculiarly "anxiety of influence" issues arising between Davey and the elder Birney; of course, the Canadian Forum, Mountain, Fiddlehead, Tamarack Review competitors who'd, of course,  have eclipsed it entirely without some token concessions to Fraser Valley inventiveness; and even the disdain of the 'modernists' Dudek, Reaney, Page, Livesay and even Layton for Tish--all these promised but failed to deliver, too.

As a chronicle of its times Tish did coincide with some rather interesting current events, Vietnam, Kennedy assassination,  Cold War, etc. And the substitution of the offset-printed for mimeograph press did begin a lifelong interest in typography for the author. 'Tis true. But, unless I misunderstood, maybe Davey's postulating some connection between TISH,via its lettering and iconography, and an interest in text production with a view to making some Da Vinci Code-type revelations: perhaps it's encrypted anti-lyrical messaging. Or maybe TISH is just the inverse of SHIT. Open Letter magazine is presumably a direct descendant of Tish, given to the same need for writing "open or serial poetics", and to be produced in "booklet" printing style with the aid of "Letraset" letters. And with the announcement of a young academic's literary mag comes a Canada Council doctoral fellowship. And a growing assimilation of radical poet turned academic (practically an archetypal figure in Canada) to a generous subsidized arts milieu signalled a renewed interest in old friends, flings who'd like perhaps to co-author new writing ventures: and so, for example, the interminable Daphne and David correspondences. And so the curious fact that today most mainstream publishing houses, and oddly even Parliamentary Poet Laureate positions, have strong ties to this one TISH phenomenon.

Friends, colleagues winning scads of Governor-General awards, and applying for teaching positions in an age of proliferating baby-boomer campuses, and getting more successful Talon books, Coach House publications and spawning TISH imitations like the 70s Kootenay School of Writing--well, what are all these but just desserts for those who contributed to the making of "Canada's most influential literary magazine".'Tis true, and little else is to be expected from post-TISH self-aggrandizement of this sort. Unless I misread I thought I saw a reference to the Nobel committee under a picture of Davey holding his horse steady for a picture. Presumably Davey's version of open poetics reaches beyond our open shores, as far as to the Academy itself. Again, the usual hilarious incongruousness. Perhaps to Davey TISH equalled Davey and all the goodies that came out if it. Brian Fawcett, who happened to be there also, seems to have arrived at pretty much the same conclusion. But TISH? Where is the impetus for Canada's "most influential literary magazine?|" I suggest that, in typical Canadian style, it probably never was.

Consider. TISH was, on its surface, a fortuitous display of lettering and parochial adaptiveness: at best, a small-town penchant for curiosity, added to expanding postsecondary opportunities after World War II. Again, its strength and mainstay was nothing more than wide-eyed curiosity. Placards and some campus demonstrations that hadn't had a chance to settle to the bottom yet would have been preferable. So what I believe happened was not TISH (though something to that effect, encouraged by the American Objectivists, did get started) but rather an emerging pedagogy of imitation that's uniquely Canadian and continues with us to the present day. There's also, by the way, that pesky Robin Mathews American-Imperialist conspiracy theory in Poetry and the Colonized Mind: Tish. And given the recent revelations about a Cold War CIA and American Abstractionist Painting connection, who's to say?

But then maybe Davey was playing on some delicious ironic sense after all: namely, that TISH (or whatever the preferred reading of that title) does really happen in Canada. And nothing but TISH. A view I'd be prepared to entertain except that, well, Davey's even made a book of Tish 1-19 publications (Vancouver: Talonbooks, 1975), codified, bound and scattered to wide undergraduate audiences everywhere. And, of course, Tallman's done something like it already.

Monday, January 16, 2012

My favourite Canadian poet, or a reply to Curtis Faville


Alden Nowlan

I've lately joined in a chorus of boos for contemporary mainstream Canadian poetry that, on the whole, I also happen to find "vanilla and inert and obtuse". But though, like Swift, I'm a hater of mankind, I happen to be also, like Swift, a lover of individuals. There are a few instances of Canadian writing that's in my opinion world-class. I've always lamented that Timothy Findley, for example, never received the Nobel for his exemplary fiction and that Bliss Carman, whose Songs from Vagabondia even got Pound's attention, was never seen as anything but a Confederation Poet. Knowing my own country as well as I do, I can see why.

There's the case of Alden Nowlan, hardly discussed anymore and yet is (in my humble estimation) Canada's greatest lyrical poet. His is the poetic voice I still revere after almost three decades. And he's the individual I love through the strength & beauty of verses alone. Of the many poems he's written perhaps none is more memorable than "The Bull Moose" (and more characteristically Easterner as well: I also happen to think the best writers are Easterners) . Here's the poem and some reasons why it's Canada's best offering to date. I may surprise some, though, with the discovery of dark corners in a place that's supposed to be cheerily lighted.

The Bull Moose

Down from the purple mist of trees on the mountain,
lurching through forests of white spruce and cedar,
stumbling through tamarack swamps,
came the bull moose
to be stopped at last by a pole-fenced pasture.

Too tired to turn or, perhaps, aware
there was no place left to go, he stood with the cattle.
They, scenting the musk of death, seeing his great head
like the ritual mask of a blood god, moved to the other end
of the field, and waited.

The neighbours heard of it, and by afternoon
cars lined the road. The children teased him
with alder switches and he gazed at them
like an old, tolerant collie. The woman asked
if he could have escaped from a Fair.

The oldest man in the parish remembered seeing
a gelded moose yoked with an ox for plowing.
The young men snickered and tried to pour beer
down his throat, while their girl friends took their pictures.

And the bull moose let them stroke his tick-ravaged flanks,
let them pry open his jaws with bottles, let a giggling girl
plant a little purple cap
of thistles on his head.

When the wardens came, everyone agreed it was a shame
to shoot anything so shaggy and cuddlesome.
He looked like the kind of pet
women put to bed with their sons.

So they held their fire. But just as the sun dropped in the river
the bull moose gathered his strength
like a scaffolded king, straightened and lifted his horns
so that even the wardens backed away as they raised their rifles.

When he roared, people ran to their cars. All the young men
leaned on their automobile horns as he toppled.


The effect is of the palpable shock to lethargic seeing that the dying animal always creates. Nowlan knew his people and reactions well enough to write it. Of its kind the poem is unsurpassable. Tragically (or perhaps unsurprisingly) the Canadian psyche will find nothing to distinguish this "blood god" massacre from that of anything or anyone else. One only has to look at the always phantasmagorical blood-letting in the writings of another Easterner, David Adams Richards, and particularly in his For Those Who Hunt the Wounded Down, to see the same archetypal bull moose at work. In fact, I'd be disprizing Nowlan's great poem if I tried to do the toppled moose one better by calling it a kind of christ-figure, with its "purple cap of thistles" and passion among the jeering crowds. (The eerie sightings of Elvis in Matt Cohen's Last Seen might be, by way of contrast, a glimpse into the urban hero after it's been bled out: and it isn't Elvis we're talking about either)

It's characteristically Canadian to pour beer down the throat of our dying symbols: to mock our greatest fears. Even our critics seem to have an inkling of this. Atwood, and this most rightly ridiculed of Canadian symbols is always at her best in criticism, says of the poem in Survival: A Thematic Guide to Canadian Literature, that the "sacrificed-god" didn't really redeem anyone (77). Certainly not. Perhaps she saw that the most terrifying image in the poem is that of the young men honking their horns: a sort of parallel "bellowing" more premonitory of human savagery than raised rifles alone.  Of course, Northrop Frye who didn't have the stomach for real "irony" might have described this (if he'd been asked) as an image of the fallen world that afflicts humans and non-humans alike (Anatomy of Criticism: 285). True but hardly insightful.

But can its claim to being lyrically supreme accommodate the horror of bloodied nature rituals in general? Is Canada, as I'm suggesting, really the place for this cruelly irreverent myth mockery?Atwood and Frye look too pitifully shallow to see through to real causes & conditions. It's perhaps time to give the origin of this penchant for malicious culture sport: namely, the usually bludgeoned psyche of a part of Canada where living conditions have always been historically the most depressed and Mt. Cashel sex scandals have lately called religious consolation back to the dark waters whence they came. Our best literatures are too stony and too strongly regional for anything but this.

Ernest Buckler, author of perhaps Canada's greatest novel The Mountain and the Valley, and also an Easterner, had a similar penchant for turning events in his fiction into troubling dream landscapes, mostly intactile, mostly gloomy. The Annapolis Valley, like Nowlan's slaughter-field, is a place "jealous of our breath" and where the vaunted Canadian indigenous is only a "shaly amalgam of replica". Which is to suggest that our greatest native traditions can't seem to find anything but dimming copies of themselves. The Totem's no longer the quintessentially native kinship symbol: carved now into images of children flailing the bull moose with alder switches. Note the unbearable friability of all things literary in the Canadian landscape: where we want literary referents to hang our hats on, we get loose slimy shale, the drama of children mocking a mock-christ.

Buckler's is no Dantean mountain in the southern hemisphere just as Alden's sacrificial moose is anything but sacrificial, nothing to write books about. There are no intervening desert slopes for archetypal heroes to anguish over either. What dying icons do in Canada is send people running to their cars howling with delight. And as there are no dangerous woods anymore, and with nothing better to imitate than the wailing moose, the horn's the only option. How well Alden knew his people and their Canadian myth-busting ways.

Alden's our best poet and my favourite because he understood as I wish more would understand. I wish our writers & critics would also admit that any literary output dissociated from the warnings & admonitions of our own wiser spirits ends in deplorableness (The plural 'spirits' is intentional here). He foresaw, or certainly wrote as if it were a truth, that  national smallness set mostly in stifling colonial (Susanna Moodie-type) narrative and never offset by anything grander than a field or valley amounts only to national smallness. It's hardly surprising that visitors at our shores see only the "vanilla" spectacles of cultural production comically dwarfed (most of the time) by its own stinking "tamarack swamps". It's best they never witness (as they will in one story, at least) the character of the cuckolded husband found frozen to death in a prairie storm, standing just meters away from his bedroom window.

Let's admit we've led only by accident many of our best literary kings to the scaffold, bull moose included: and nothing as grandiose as death by prophecy will ever appear here as a result. Canada's very best (who I happen to think hail from the East) have always served up that humiliating spectacle to us. I've at least admitted it to myself.

Friday, January 6, 2012

Translating Eugenio Montale: or who really ought to try it

Eugenio Montale

Art can only live within a process of liberation. Art is, so to speak, always democratic - its productive mechanism is democratic, in the sense that it produces language, words, colours and sounds which pull together into communities, new communities. In order to escape the aesthetic illusion, we have to flee solitude; in order to construct art, we have to construct liberation in its collective figure (Antonio Negri)

Don Share's recent post on his own tribute (at times maudlin) to the distinguished Montale translator William Arrowsmith had me reaching for my Eugenio Montale: Collected Poems 1920-1954 (trans. by Jonathan Galassi). As I'm generally inclined to lay the blame for both the theory and transmission of disastrous poetry at the academic's doorstep anyways, the thought did occur to me that perhaps Share's encomiums on Arrowsmith's Montale translations are a tad exaggerated. I maintain the best translators (like the best poets) must have an exquisitely rhythmical ear for the original inaccessible to everyone except well, those with an exquisitely rhythmical ear. Perhaps only poets can do the job. I doubt the academic-translator ever can. Ever.

I have to admit Share's comments annoyed me a little, too: both the fawning tribute, self-serving affiliations to the best ever teacher that ever taught comparative literature in the whole wide world. But I don't have a bone to pick with Arrowsmith's competent translations (of which I've read a few). I'd rather like to save the integrity of the great Italian Nobel laureate from translation controversy altogether. And to do that I'm going to post a poem and--you guessed it!--offer a translation of my own. I'm not presuming to do one better than Arrowsmith, however. That's not the point. It's rather my way of wresting the pristine mystery of poetry out of the academic's tight grip: my way of giving back to the 'commons' what's been filched by the professionals.

Montale was not an academic: he lived life beyond the graduate seminar room, risking life and career for political beliefs he never hesitated to put into his own writings. It follows for me that the academic-translator oughtn't really to try it since it's always resulted in straitjacketed versions that conform to personal temperament and pet literary theory. There are the academic-translators who also happen to be poets, exceptionally good ones, like Robert Bly and Clayton Eshleman, but they are few in number. The aim here is to offer a translation in esteem and gratitude only to the great Modernist bard. I'd like to make translation (in all its forms: from the strictly literal to 'homophonic') a publicly accessible and deeply appreciative event.

And so alllow me to begin now with "Portami il girasole", "Give me sunflowers!" Wildly differing (or asphyxiating 'word for word') versions are welcome here.

Portami il girasole

Portami il girasole ch'io lo trapianti
nel mio terreno bruciato dal salino,
e mostri tutto il giorno agli azzurri specchianti
del cielo l'ansietà del suo volto giallino.

Tendono alla chiarità le cose oscure,
si esauriscono i corpi in un fluire
di tinte: queste in musiche. Svanire
è dunque la ventura delle venture.

Portami tu la pianta che conduce
dove sorgono bionde trasparenze
e vapora la vita quale essenza;
portami il girasole impazzito di luce.
____________________________________
Give me sunflowers!     (trans. C.DiDiodato)

Give me sunflowers to take to
my patch of salt-burnt ground,
its wizened yellow turned
   daily to a mirroring sky!

Dark things clamor for clarity,
bodies run dry in flowing hues:
as in music. A show of shows
    is this fading!

Give me the plant whence this
clamoring of yellow, and this
fading of essential life come--
   oh! light-crazed plant.
_________________________________________
Bring me the sunflower    (trans. Joseph Hutchison)

Bring me the sunflower, and I’ll make it    
take root in my garden seared by salt wind,
and all day long the sky’s blue will reflect
upon the excitation of its yellow face.

All dark things lean toward clarity,
bodies exhaust themselves into a flow
of colors: into these airs. To fade away,
then, is the most adventurous venture.

Bring me the plant that leads us up
to where blonde transparencies arise
and the essence of life mists away;
bring me the sunflower crazed by light
______________________________________
Bring me the Sunflower    (trans. A. Wyndham)

Bring me the sunflower to take root
in my blistered, earth-bound pod,
to show, every day, to the mirrored blue
sky its anguished, xanthous-hued face.

Compelled to clarify the darkness,
our bodies exhaust themselves in dissipating strains:
like faded melodies. We vanish -
the inevitable fortune of such venture.

Point me to where I can find
transparence emerge
and send forth life's essence, so fleeting.
Bring me one sunflower suffused with such light!

"Rapture" by Dorothea Tanning

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Carson McCullers: where have you been?




I discovered Carson McCullers quite serendipitously or rather I should say I stumbled upon her in a Roberto Bolaño poem from the Tres collection (seen here) , a sort of dream sequence in which McCullers appears as one of Bolaño's erotic partners. A little online research led me to a sampling of poetry from The Mortgaged Heart, a collection of poems, essays and stories.

Best known for her novel The Heart is a Lonely Hunter (an Oprah book!), it's probably safe to say that any notoriety she enjoyed as a poet was a function of an acutely dysfunctional life. If not directly visible in her poetry, it's probably more the 'urban legend' of the wildly promiscuous, drunken artiste that bestows any literary value on her. Generalizations like this, however, ought to be reserved for a wider study of her life and works.

The small sampling of poetry I've read online does, however, rather endear her to me. It's not the clever Levertov nor exquisitely sensuous Loy nor even wildly joyous DiPrima I detect but rather a lonely girl grappling with "fractioned" gods and metaphysicals. Who wouldn't bend under that weight. Or if  the poet-persona herself isn't to blame for the mess her life is in, perhaps it's best to look at those shabby religious distinctions (between '"Father" and "sorrow of separation"; "God" and "Thing") and the twisted theology they invoke. What was she thinking? The tragedy lies perhaps in the fact that she quite possibly worshipped before she wrote them.

I think the great Bolaño must have envisaged love with McCullers as a case of two broken angel-halves trying (rather pathetically) to look whole. Ah, perhaps it takes one to know one.


Father, Upon Thy Image We Are Spanned

Why are we split upon our double nature, how are we planned?
Father, upon what Image are we spanned?
Turning helpless in the garden of right and wrong
Mocked by the reversibles of good and evil
Heir of the exile. Lucifer, and brother of Thy universal Son
Who said it is finished when Thy synthesis was just begun.
We suffer the sorrow of separation and division
With a heart that blazes with Christ's vision:
That though we be deviously natured, dual-planned,
Father, upon Thy image we are spanned.
AVE

Stone Is Not Stone

There was a time when stone was stone
And a face on the street was a finished face.
Between the Thing, myself and God alone
There was an instant symmetry.
Since you have altered all my world this trinity is twisted:
Stone is not stone
And faces like the fractioned characters in dreams are incomplete
Until in the child's inchoate face
I recognize your exiled eyes.
The soldier climbs the glaring stair leaving your shadow.
Tonight, this torn room sleeps
Beneath the starlight bent by you

    Sunday, January 1, 2012

    "Urbi et Orbi"


    When folio editions dripped from the first movable types,
      quasars twitched with pleasaunce!
    "Please to render unto Spirit what is Spirit's," saith one emerging
      Sense, einmal...nur einmal.

    With every intention, of course, of ending thought like a dot,
      and defending Abelard at the Sorbonne,
    &, among other things, his contributions to free love verse,
      Aion plied the reins more softly, as it were

    and stood to suffer real imprisonment for time bound views!
      But how to stop the ungovernable Infinitive!
    One did. Unmoved by You or Time, he's authorized to halt any star
      and take away its salt,

    one Ratzinger who's rung the chapel-bell a lot for inquests
      into the matter of bad Aion-Jesuits.
    "To be can be construed as an affront, can it not, to Being on High?
      Sense is the Es-sence as Smell is the Sense

    of all pollen-bearing Plants, is it not?" the Cardinal sniffed and made
      the Earth ill. Now Aion replied, pettishly
    but the only thing that could be compared to it, for rhetoric & verve
      were radiation traces of God

    cracking his knuckles. "To be is to be for me," the Ratz said, and
     one more quasar limped