The
good...
What is this, behind this veil, is it ugly, is it beautiful?
It is shimmering, has it breasts, has it edges?
I am sure it is unique, I am sure it is what I want.
When I am quiet at my cooking I feel it looking, I feel it thinking
'Is this the one I am too appear for,
Is this the elect one, the one with black eye-pits and a scar?
Measuring the flour, cutting off the surplus,
Adhering to rules, to rules, to rules.
Is this the one for the annunciation?
My god, what a laugh!'
But it shimmers, it does not stop, and I think it wants me.
I would not mind if it were bones, or a pearl button.
I do not want much of a present, anyway, this year.
After all I am alive only by accident.
I would have killed myself gladly that time any possible way.
(from "A Birthday Present", Sylvia Plath)
The
bad...
We thought it could all be found in The Book of Poor Text,
the shadow the boat casts, angled mast, fretted wake, indigo eye.
Windows of the blind text,
keening, parabolic nights.
And the rolling sun, sun tumbling
into then under, company of moths.
Can you hear what I'm thinking, from there, even as you sleep?
Streets of the Poor Text, where a child's gaze falls
on the corpse of a horse beside a cart,
whimpering dog, woman's mute mouth agape
as if to say, We must move on,
we must not stop, we must not watch.
(from "Company of Moths", Michael Palmer)
___________________________
The voice of irrationality or life by accident: whose is better here? Palmer's, again, seeps like gas to bubble at the surface or plugs space so full of incommensurabilities the next line's as predictable as "Can you hear what I'm thinking..."Predictable as the rest. But the gift, the veil or whatever's behind it, in Plath could not have been more simply intuited because more stylistically attuned to its devastating mundaneness and cruelty, as gift. There's a world here to gather & all the distant tragedies enclosed therein (as we very well know): the conditions of a verse's ceaseless and unstinting possibility. Again, what killed Plath is precisely the "closed window" of the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E text, long long after the fact. It always has just this way, by wresting the 'being' out of us, of foreclosing the past in a willfulness that amounts to linguicide.
L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E is a linguicide and here is the second proof.