I hereby give "Word-Dreamer: poetics" to you. Please share, copy, archive and show to anyone anything you want. It's a shared culture out there: and so let's act as if it were one. A sense of ownership impels me to respect copyright but then how would you know me if I kept it all to myself? I thrive by needing you, needing a culture of Internet readers and needing the only true networked freedom we've got (after Nina Paley).
Monday, April 2, 2012
April is poetry month: what's good and what's not
The good...
"I know you, monster-head! Once more face to face. We
take up the long debate where we left off.
And you may urge your arguments like snouts low over
the water: I will leave you no rest and no respite.
On too many frequented shores have my footsteps been
washed away before the day, on too many deserted beds has
my soul been delivered up to the cancer of silence.
What more do you want of me, O breath of origin? And
you, what more would you drag from my living lips..."
(from Exile, St.-John Perse)
The bad...
Word's a sentence before it's a word -- I write
Sentences -- When words are, meaning soon follows -- Where
words join, writing is -- One's writing is one writing --
Not all letters are equal -- 2 phrases yield an angle --
Eye settles in the middle of word, left of center -- Reference
is a compass -- Each day -- Performance seeks
vaudeville -- Composition as investigation -- Collage is a
false democracy -- Spelling's choices
(from FOR L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, Ron Silliman)
____________________
Again, Perse's perfect mythopoeia and language fit, drinking at the same stream. And think of all the great monsters it's foreseen: from Sidney to Proust. I've borrowed his Peregrine and made the conversions to dark exilic moods myself. With him I've made cancer-leafs and burned Jesuits with the anvil-necklace for wanting illusional peewit wives. I know who the Father really is. Why do only the great Talmudists, the great ones! get to enjoy a language fit for the Master of the Universe? La simple chose que voilà applied to skeletons and shores...? Why can't Perse be my Corman?
In Silliman's abcediary a word, phrase & sentence at a time peck in the dirt, envying the superior snouts. Not being one means he has to form the vowels with his ope lips and blow them out, a disgraceful ritual that's sometimes sputters through the beard. In fact, there's neither sense nor Sentence here if you look carefully, just the child's rambling (minus the child's imaginative vision), the sand (minus the seas). Silliman writes sentences (and nothing could be easier) while Perse breathes. In Silliman a series of equal signs to help connect the lines while Perse's "a language free of usage and pure". Silliman's banausic verse fit for advisory boards...puffing at the shores.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
well
the besets that I can come
up with
on such short notice:
1. the Dot de-pends on the Point
2. the Point is pointless w/out the Dot
3. connecting the Dots to make a Point
doesn't ring the Bell
etcs
Ah, if Silliman only had this minimalist flair for the silly, he'd see how silly his Sentence is..
well, Bear wit' me a moment more as I
begin (again) w Kandinsky's 1928:
POINT AND LINE TO PLANE
am now re:reading it as fast as I can
so as to comprehend, in one fell swoop,
,
that section "Geometrical point"
" In geometry, the point is an invisible entity. It must, therefore, be defined as a nonmaterial being. Thought of in material terms, the point resembles a nought.
" In this nought, however, are concealed various "human" qualities. In our minds, this nought -the geometrical point - is associated with the utmost conciseness, i.e., the greatest, although eloquent, reserve.
" Thus, the geometrical point is, in our imagination, the ultimate and most singular combination of silence and speech.
" For this reason, the geometrical point has assumed material form primarily in writing - it belongs to speech and indicates silence."
" (etc)."
so ? we combinate as
it is not
this OR that
it is, rather
this AND that
Post a Comment